Lawwly

Cessac v. Stevens

District Court of Appeal of Florida

127 So. 3d 675 (2013)

Relevant factsFree

Sally Christiansen was a beneficiary of three trusts created by her father, each providing that upon her death, trust assets would pass to whomever she appointed in her will, but only if her will made "specific reference to the power herein granted"; otherwise the assets would go equally to her two children, including Marcia Stevens. Christiansen's will left $5,000 to another person and the rest of her estate to Joanne Cessac, and it mentioned one trust by name and location and referred generally to "two" others held at a different institution — but it never mentioned the power of appointment itself. After Christiansen died, Stevens sought a declaration that the trust assets should pass to her and her brother because Christiansen never properly exercised her appointment power, and the trial court agreed. Cessac (as representative of Christiansen's estate) appealed.

IssueFree

Whether, when a trust requires a donee to specifically reference the trust in order to exercise a testamentary power of appointment, the donee's will must reference both the trust and the power of appointment to validly exercise that power.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases