Lawwly

Capital Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

431 S.E.2d 763 (N.C. 1993)

Relevant factsFree

Raleigh (defendant) enacted a billboard-amortization ordinance in 1983 requiring certain oversized billboards to be removed by April 24, 1989, after holding two years of meetings attended by billboard-industry representatives; billboard companies including Capital Outdoor Advertising (plaintiffs) waited until April 12, 1989 — just twelve days before the removal deadline — to sue, claiming the ordinance was an uncompensated regulatory taking and exceeded the city's police power. The trial court dismissed the suit as time-barred under a nine-month statute of limitations, finding the claim accrued when the ordinance passed in 1983; the court of appeals reversed, finding the claim didn't accrue until the amortization period expired in 1989, and Raleigh appealed.

IssueFree

Whether a legal challenge to a municipal billboard-amortization ordinance accrues, for statute-of-limitations purposes, at the time the ordinance is enacted or at the later time its removal deadline expires.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases