Lawwly

Butler v. Sears, Roebuck and Co.

United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

702 F.3d 359 (2012)

Relevant factsFree

Sears, Roebuck and Company (Sears) (defendant) faced two separate products-liability class actions over washing machines — one alleging the machines caused mold, another alleging they suddenly stopped working — and Whirlpool, the manufacturer, had made design changes to some mold-prone models over time. Sears argued these varying design modifications meant different machines were defective in different ways, making class treatment inappropriate; the district court denied certification to the mold plaintiffs but granted it to the stoppage plaintiffs, and both the mold plaintiffs and Sears appealed their respective rulings.

IssueFree

Whether a class will be certified for a class action if the question of fact or law common to class members predominates over any questions affecting only individual members.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases