Lawwly

Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. Sarony

United States Supreme Court

111 U.S. 53 (1884)

Relevant factsFree

Photographer Napoleon Sarony (plaintiff) created a carefully composed portrait of Oscar Wilde, personally arranging the background, clothing, pose, and expression; Burrow-Giles Lithographic Company (Burrow-Giles) (defendant) reproduced the photograph without permission. Sarony sued for copyright infringement under a federal statute extending protection to photographs alongside works like paintings and engravings; the circuit court ruled for Sarony, and the Supreme Court granted certiorari, with Burrow-Giles arguing that a photograph merely captures an existing scene and lacks the creative authorship copyright is meant to protect.

IssueFree

Whether Congress may constitutionally provide copyright protection to photographs as works of original authorship.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases