Boese v. Paramount Pictures Corporation
United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
952 F.Supp. 550 (1996)
Forensic chemist Robert Boese (plaintiff) testified for an insurer that a fire was caused by arson; the accused homeowner, Weathers, was acquitted and later won a large judgment against the insurer. A television news program produced by Paramount Pictures (defendant) aired a segment on the case that included footage of Boese testifying and closed with Weathers saying everybody had lied and it came back to haunt them. Boese sued Paramount for false-light invasion of privacy, alleging the segment implied he had lied under oath, and that the reporters never contacted him or investigated other available sources — evidence, he argued, of actual malice. Paramount moved for summary judgment, and separately argued the statement was a protected opinion rather than a factual claim.
Whether the tort of false-light invasion of privacy requires the plaintiff to prove he was placed in a false light, that the false light would be highly offensive to a reasonable person, and that the defendant acted with actual malice.