Apex LLC v. Sharing World, Inc.
California Court of Appeal for the Fourth District, Division 3
206 Cal. App. 4th 999 (2012)
Relevant factsFree
Sharing World's (defendant) written contracts with Apex (plaintiff) called for unconditional purchases of cottonseed, but when cottonseed prices dropped and Sharing World's own downstream buyers stopped sending letters of credit, Sharing World refused nearly 15,000 tons and claimed an oral condition precedent — receipt of those third-party letters of credit — governed the deal; the trial court credited this oral condition and ruled for Sharing World.
IssueFree
Whether, if purported additional oral terms to a written contract are such that, if agreed upon, they would have been included in the contract, the terms are admissible at trial.
Related cases
Dayka & Hackett, LLC v. Del Monte Fresh Produce N.A., Inc.269 P.3d 709 (2012)Curb Records Inc. v. McGraw2012 WL 4377817 (Sept. 25, 2012)Heacker v. Safeco Insurance Company of America676 F.3d 724 (2012)Panther Partners Inc. v. Ikanos Communications, Inc.681 F.3d 114 (2d Cir. 2012)NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of Argentina699 F.3d 246 (2012)