Lawwly

Alexander Hamilton Life Insurance Co. v. Lewis

Supreme Court of Kentucky

550 S.W.2d 558 (1977)

Relevant factsFree

The Lewises (defendants) won and collected an insurance-policy judgment on their missing daughter's life, but the judgment was set aside after they learned she was alive; Hamilton (plaintiff) sought full repayment, while the Lewises argued repayment would be inequitable since they had already spent the money on debts, home improvements, education, cars, and their daughter's medical care, though their overall net worth still exceeded what they'd received.

IssueFree

Whether unjustly received money must be repaid in a restitution action even if already spent, absent expenditures so large relative to the payee's financial condition that repayment would be inequitable.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases