Lawwly

14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett

Supreme Court of the United States

556 U.S. 247 (2009)

Relevant factsFree

Pyett and other night watchmen and security workers (plaintiffs) worked at 14 Penn Plaza (defendant) under a collective-bargaining agreement between their union and an industry labor board. After the union consented, the defendant hired a different unionized security firm and reassigned the plaintiffs-the only building employees over 50-to less desirable jobs as night porters and cleaners. Believing this was age discrimination, the plaintiffs asked the union to grieve it, but the union withdrew the age-discrimination issue from arbitration. The plaintiffs then sued in federal court under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA); the defendant argued the agreement's arbitration clause required them to arbitrate instead.

IssueFree

Whether a provision in a collective-bargaining agreement that clearly and unmistakably requires union members to arbitrate ADEA claims is enforceable as a matter of federal law.

Unlock the full brief

Free accounts read 20 full briefs. No card required.

Related cases