top of page

O'Bannon v. NCAA

United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

802 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 2015)

Summary
Procedural History
Judicial Opinion
Citations

The amateurism rules, which limit student-athlete compensation to only scholarships and prohibit even small deferred cash payments, do not violate antitrust laws.

Relevant Facts

Former all-American UCLA basketball player Ed O’Bannon (the plaintiff) found an avatar of himself in a video game. The plaintiff did not give consent to be placed in the video game, nor was he paid for its use. As a result, the plaintiff sued the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) and the Collegiate Licensing Company, which licenses NCAA trademarks (collectively the defendants), alleging that the rules forbidding paying an athlete violated the Sherman Antitrust Act. The NCAA enforced an amateurism rule, which permitted schools to pay athletes grants-in-aid covering tuition and fees, room and board, and required textbooks, but prohibited any athlete from receiving pay for their athletic performance of any kind, including the use of an athlete’s name, image, and likeness. The trial court found the NCAA compensation rules to be an unlawful restraint of trade and enjoined it from prohibiting schools from paying athletes up to $5,000 in deferred compensation. The NCAA appealed.

Issue

Get access to our database of over 17,000+ case briefs today. Access our issue statements for every case you'll encounter in law school for a low monthly price. The largest database on the internet is now available with Lawwly, the central legal hub. Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings in seconds, to supplement your notes and outlines, and to outshine your classmates. No one has a more comprehensive case brief database than Lawwly. All of our briefs are handwritten by real legal experts and law professors and our stringent editing process ensures you'll get the best quality briefs available.

Holding & Reasoning

Get access to our database of over 17,000+ case briefs today. Access holding & reasonings for every case you'll encounter in law school for a low monthly price. The largest database on the internet is now available with Lawwly, the central legal hub. Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings in seconds, to supplement your notes and outlines, and to outshine your classmates. No one has a more comprehensive case brief database than Lawwly. All of our briefs are handwritten by real legal experts and law professors and our stringent editing process ensures you'll get the best quality briefs available.

Concurrence

Get access to our database of over 17,000+ case briefs today. Access all available concurrences for every case you'll encounter in law school for a low monthly price. The largest database on the internet is now available with Lawwly, the central legal hub. Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings in seconds, to supplement your notes and outlines, and to outshine your classmates. No one has a more comprehensive case brief database than Lawwly. All of our briefs are handwritten by real legal experts and law professors and our stringent editing process ensures you'll get the best quality briefs available.

Dissent

Get access to our database of over 17,000+ case briefs today. Access all available dissents for every case you'll encounter in law school for a low monthly price. The largest database on the internet is now available with Lawwly, the central legal hub. Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings in seconds, to supplement your notes and outlines, and to outshine your classmates. No one has a more comprehensive case brief database than Lawwly. All of our briefs are handwritten by real legal experts and law professors and our stringent editing process ensures you'll get the best quality briefs available.

Last updated:

December 23, 2020

Judicial Opinion

Get access to our database of over 17,000 case briefs today. Our database of judicial opinions will be released soon, for free!

Procedural History

Get access to our database of over 17,000+ case briefs today. Access the entire procedural history for every case you'll encounter in law school for a low monthly price. The largest database on the internet is now available with Lawwly, the central legal hub. Use our case briefs to comprehend your casebook readings in seconds, to supplement your notes and outlines, and to outshine your classmates. No one has a more comprehensive case brief database than Lawwly. All of our briefs are handwritten by real legal experts and law professors and our stringent editing process ensures you'll get the best quality briefs available.

Citations

802 F.3d 1049 (9th Cir. 2015)

bottom of page